The essence of all etiquette is to be found in the observance of the spirit of the Golden Rule. Perhaps in no one point is the “do unto others as ye would that they should do unto you,” more applicable than in the prompt acknowledgment of either a formal or a friendly invitation. This acknowledgment may be either denial or assent, but whatever the form, it is requisite that the proffered courtesy should be answered by a prompt and decisive acceptance or refusal. This is a duty owed by an invited guest to his prospective host or hostess and one that should never be neglected.
Answering an Invitation.
In accepting or declining an invitation close attention should be paid to the form in which it is written and the same style followed in the answer. For instance: should the invitation be formal, the answer should preserve the same degree of formality; while a friendly invitation in note form should meet with an acceptance or regret couched in the same terms. Another rule to be rigidly observed is, that the acceptance or refusal must be written in the same person that characterized the invitation. For instance: if “Mr. and Mrs. Algernon Smith request the pleasure of the company of Mr. and Mrs. Joseph Bronson at dinner, etc.,” with equal stateliness “Mr. and Mrs. Joseph Bronson accept with pleasure the kind invitation of Mr. and Mrs. Algernon Smith.” To do otherwise would imply ignorance of the very rudiments of social or grammatical rules.
A friendly note of invitation, beginning somewhat after this fashion: “Mr. Smith and I would be pleased to have you and Mr. Brown, etc.,” would be accepted or declined in the same fashion and person, as: “Mr. Brown and I accept with pleasure your kind invitation, etc.” To answer such an invitation with a formal acceptance, or regret, written in the third person, as given above, would display profound ignorance of social customs.
An acceptance or regret, written in the first person, receives the signature of the writer, but one written in the third person remains unsigned. To sign it would produce a confusion of persons and be ungrammatical to the last degree. Another error to be avoided is that of beginning in this fashion: “I accept with pleasure the kind invitation of Mr. and Mrs. John Jones,” this also producing a change of person altogether inadmissible. Neither must one be betrayed into the mistake of using the words, “will accept,” thus throwing the acceptance into the future tense, when, in reality, you do accept, in the present tense, at the moment of writing.
Accepting a Dinner Invitation.
Incumbent upon us as it is to answer the majority of our invitations in either the affirmative or negative, there are degrees of necessity even here, for, sin as we may in all other particulars, there is an unwritten code like unto the laws of the Medes and Persians which declareth that the invitations to a dinner are not to be lightly set aside. First, an invitation to a dinner is the highest social compliment that a host and hostess can pay to those invited, and, second, the guests are limited in number and painstakingly arranged in congenial couples by the careful hostess. Judge, then, of her disappointment, when, at the last moment, some delinquent sends in a hasty regret leaving little or no time to fill that terror of all dinner-givers, that skeleton at the feast, an empty chair. One such failure is sufficient to ruin the most carefully-arranged table and is an injury to host and hostess that only the occurrence of some unforeseen calamity can justify.
ANSWERING AN INVITATION.
In answering an invitation it is well to repeat the date, as: “Your kind invitation for Tuesday, May fifth.” This will give an opportunity, if any mistakes have been made in dates, to rectify them at once. This caution it would be well to observe in answering any invitation.