Fig. 4.—Read Holliday’s lamp for burning light coal-tar oils. The oil is contained in the cistern c, from whence it flows down the pipe, when the stopcock is opened, into the burner a. Below the burner is a little cup, in which some of the oil is kept burning, and the heat from this flame volatilizes the oil as it flows down the pipe, the vapour thus generated issuing from the jets in the burner and there undergoing ignition. The burner and cup are shown on an enlarged scale at a in the lower figure.
In 1825 Michael Faraday discovered a hydrocarbon in the oil produced by the condensation of “oil gas”—an illuminating gas obtained by the destructive distillation of oleaginous materials. This hydrocarbon was analysed by its illustrious discoverer, and named in accordance with his results “bicarburet of hydrogen.” In 1834 the same hydrocarbon was obtained by Mitscherlich by heating benzoic acid with lime, and by Péligot by the dry distillation of calcium benzoate. For this reason the compound was named “benzin” by Mitscherlich, which name was changed into “benzol” by Liebig. In this country the hydrocarbon is known at the present time as benzene. Twenty years after Faraday’s discovery, viz. in 1845, Hofmann proved the existence of benzene in the light oils from coal-tar, and in 1848 Hofmann’s pupil, Mansfield, isolated considerable quantities of this hydrocarbon from the said light oils by fractional distillation. At the time of these investigations no great demand for benzene existed, but the work of Hofmann and Mansfield prepared the way for its manufacture on a large scale, when, a few years later, the first coal-tar colouring-matter was discovered by our countryman, W. H. Perkin.
It is always of interest to trace the influence of scientific discovery upon different branches of industry. As soon as it had been shown that benzene could be obtained from coal-tar, the nitro-derivative of this hydrocarbon—i.e. the oily compound produced by the action of nitric acid upon benzene—was introduced as a substitute for bitter almond oil under the name of “essence of mirbane.” Nitrobenzene has an odour resembling that of bitter almond oil, and it is still used for certain purposes where the latter can be replaced by its cheaper substitute, such as for the scenting of soap. Although the isolation of benzene from coal-tar gave an impetus to the manufacture of nitrobenzene, no use existed for the latter beyond its very limited application as “essence of mirbane,” and the production of this compound was at that time too insignificant to take rank as an important branch of chemical industry.
The year 1856 marks an epoch in the history of the utilization of coal-tar products with which the name of Perkin will ever be associated. In the course of some experiments, having for their object the artificial production of quinine, this investigator was led to try the action of oxidizing agents upon a base known as aniline, and he thus obtained a violet colouring matter—the first dye from coal-tar—which was manufactured under a patent granted in 1858, and introduced into commerce under the name of mauve. A brief sketch of the history of aniline will serve to show how Perkin’s discovery gave a new value to the light oils from coal-tar and raised the manufacture of nitrobenzene into an important branch of industry.
Thirty years before Perkin’s experiments the Dutch chemist Unverdorben obtained (1826) a liquid base by the distillation of indigo, which had the property of forming beautifully crystalline salts, and which he named for this reason “crystallin.” In 1834 Runge discovered the same base in coal-tar, although its identity was not known to him at the time, and because it gave a bluish colour when acted upon by bleaching-powder, he called it “kyanol.” Again in 1840, by distilling a product obtained by the action of caustic alkalies upon indigo, Fritzsche prepared the same base, and gave it the name of aniline, from the Spanish designation of the indigo plant, “anīl,” derived from the native Indian word, by which name the base is known at the present time. That aniline could be obtained by the reduction of nitrobenzene was shown by Zinin in 1842, who used sulphide of ammonium for reducing the nitrobenzene, and named the resulting base “benzidam.” The following year Hofmann showed that crystallin, kyanol, aniline, and benzidam were all one and the same base. Thus when the discovery of mauve opened up a demand for aniline on the large scale, the labours of chemists, from Unverdorben in 1826 to Hofmann in 1843, had prepared the way for the manufacturer. It must be understood that although Runge had discovered aniline in coal-tar, this is not the source of our present supply, for the quantity is too small to make it worth extracting. A mere trace of aniline is present in the tar ready formed; from the time this base was wanted in large quantities it had to be made by nitrating benzene, and then reducing the nitrobenzene.
The light oils of tar distillation rejected by the timber-pickling industry now came to the front, imbued with new interest to the technologist as a source of benzene for the manufacture of aniline. The inauguration of this manufacture, like the introduction of steam locomotion, is connected with a sad catastrophe. Mansfield, who first showed manufacturers how to separate benzene and other hydrocarbons from the light oils of coal-tar, and who devised for this purpose apparatus similar in principle to that used on a large scale at the present time (see [Fig. 5]), met with an accident which resulted in his death. In the upper part of a house in Holborn in February 1856, this pioneer was carrying on his experiments, when the contents of a still boiled over and caught fire. In his endeavours to extinguish the flames he received the injuries which terminated fatally. Applied science no less than pure science has had its martyrs, and among these Mansfield must be ranked.
