Nothing has been said as to the effect of Settlements on Oxford and Cambridge. There does not seem to be much change in the attitude of these Universities to social reform, and they are not apparently moved by any impulse which comes from workmen. But judgment in this matter must be cautious as changes may be going on unnoticed. It is certain, at any rate, that the individual members who have lived among the poor are changed. If a greater number would live in the same way that experience could not fail ultimately to influence University life.
Social reform will soon be the all-absorbing interest as the modern realization of the claims of human nature and the growing power of the people, will not tolerate many of the present conditions of industrial life. The well-being of the future depends on the methods by which reform proceeds. Reforms in the past have often been disappointing. They have been made in the name of the rights of one class, and have ended in the assertion of rights over another class. They have been made by force and produced reaction. They have been done for the people not by the people, and have never been assimilated. The method by which knowledge and industry may co-operate has yet to be tried, and one way in which to bring about such co-operation is the way of University Settlements.
Samuel A. Barnett.
SECTION IV.
POVERTY AND LABOUR.
[The Ethics of the Poor Law]—[Poverty, its Cause and Cure]—[Babies of the State]—[Poor Law Reform]—[The Unemployed]—[The Poor Law Report]—[Widows under the Poor Law]—[The Press and Charitable Funds]—[What is Possible in Poor Law Reform]—[Charity Up To Date]—[What Labour wants]—[Our Present Discontents.]
THE ETHICS OF THE POOR LAW.[[1]]
By Mrs. S. A. Barnett.
October, 1907.
[1] A Paper read at the Church Congress at Yarmouth.