Finally, the endnotes are themselves somewhat disorganized. Each is referred to in the text by an unnumbered (asterisk or dagger) footnote referring to an endnote, e.g.:
* See note [B] at the end of the volume.
However, there are a number of errors. The endnotes for Tertullian (B), Tactitus (C), and Herodotus (D) are referred to incorrectly as C, D B in the text. Notes U and V (for Julian and Sozomen) are reversed in the endnotes. Note U (Sozomen) is referred to as [X] but Note X describes Dominic de Guzman. However, the footnote in the text for de Guzman refers to [Z], which does not exist. The endnote for Chrysostom (W) is referred to the the footnotes as Y, which does not exist. J also does not exist, either in the endnotes or in footnotes.
To avoid the many confusions, these footnote references to the endnotes as well as the endnotes themselves, have been resequenced from A to W, in the order of their appearance in the endnotes and the footnote references have been corrected to direct the reader to the correct place. This means that the corresponding footnotes may not occur in sequence.
This table summarizes the various errors regarding the endnotes.
| Name | Endnote | Footnote |
| Tertullian | B | C |
| Tactitus | C | D |
| Herodotus | D | B |
| Julian | V | U |
| Sozomen | U | V |
| Chrysostom | W | Y |
| Dominic de Guzman | X | Z |
The endnotes have been resequenced as follows:
| A | Socrates |
| B | Tertullian |
| C | Tacitus |
| D | Herodotus |
| E | Justin Martyr |
| F | Polycarp |
| G | Cyprian |
| H | Hottinger |
| I | Irenus |
| J | Eusebius |
| K | Sabellius |
| L | Arius |
| M | Constantine |
| N | Socrates (of Constantinople) |
| O | Athanasius |
| P | Theodoret |
| Q | Gregory Nazianzen |
| R | Porphyrius |
| S | Saint Jerome |
| T | Julian |
| U | Sozomen |
| V | Chrysostom St. John, |
| W | Dominic de Guzman |
On p. [149], a footnote (note [245] here), referring to the Buckley edition of Jacques de Thou’s Historia du temporis had no reference in the text. One has been placed at the beginning of the extended quotation beginning on that page, which seems the most likely referent.
On p. [288], the third footnote (note [300] here) had no reference in the text. It most likely refers to the final sentence in the section, regarding the Langrave of Hesse Cassel, and has been placed there.