Place the emphasis on “me”; for “rage” is a mere repetition of “wrath.”
“Cym. O disloyal thing;
That should'st repair my youth; thou heapest
A year's age on me!”
How is it that the commentators take no notice of the un-Shakespearian defect in the metre of the second line, and what in Shakespeare is the same, [pg 119] in the harmony with the sense and feeling? Some word or words must have slipped out after “youth,”—possibly “and see”:—
“That should'st repair my youth!—and see, thou heap'st,” &c.
Ib. sc. 3. Pisanio's speech:—
... “For so long
As he could make me with this eye or ear
Distinguish him from others,” &c.