[26]. Nothing more than a superficial comparison with Fichte is here intended. A large majority of the texts and the commentary literature would oppose the attempts of all those who would like to interpret Sāṃkhya-yoga on Fichtean lines.
[27]. Tattvakaumudī on Sāṃkhya-kārikā, 25.
[28]. Tattvavaiśāradī, III. 41.
[29]. This was first pointed out by Dr. B. N. Seal in his Physical, Chemical and Mechanical Theories of the Ancient Hindus in Dr. P. C. Ray’s Hindu Chemistry, Vol. II.
[30]. Yoga-vārttika, I. 45.
[31]. I have already said before that Bhikshu thinks that the guṇas (except the all-pervading ones) may be compared to the Vaiśeshika atoms. See Yoga-vārttika, III. 52.
[32]. Cf. Vyāsa-bhāshya—“sabdādīnāṃ mūrttisamānajátīyānāṃ,” IV. 14.
[33]. Vyāsa-bhāshya, II. 19.
[34]. Vyāsa-bhāshya, III. 13.
[35]. Ibid.