The reader will find a great deal about Kyan’s system in the ‘Quarterly Review,’ April, 1833; and about proposals for using chloride of mercury for wood, ‘Memoirs of the Academy of Dijon,’ 1767; ‘Bull. des Sciences teen.,’ v. ii., 1824, Paris; and ‘Bull. de Pharm.,’ v. 6, 1814, Paris.
It is well known that Canadian timber is much more liable to decay than that grown in the northern parts of Europe, and for this reason is never extensively used in buildings of a superior description. The principle of decay being destroyed by Kyan’s process as above described, this objection no longer exists, and this kind of timber may therefore now be employed with as great security as that of a superior quality and higher price. The same observation applies with great force to timber of British growth, particularly to that of Scotland, much of which is considered as of little or no value for durable purposes, on account of its extreme liability to decay, whether in exposed situations or otherwise. The process invented by Kyan might therefore render of considerable value plantations of larch, firs of all kinds, birch, elm, beech, ash, poplar, &c.
Cost of process in 1832, 1l. per load of 50 cubic feet of timber.
Mr. W. Inwood, the architect of St. Pancras Church, London, reported favourably of Kyan’s process. On 22nd February, 1833, Professor Faraday delivered a lecture at the Royal Institution, London, on Kyanizing timber; and on 17th April, 1837, he reported that Kyan’s process had not caused any rusting or oxidation of the iron in the ship ‘Samuel Enderby,’ after the ship had been subjected to this process, and had been on a three years’ voyage to the South Sea fisheries; and in the same year, viz. 1837, Dr. Dickson delivered a lecture at the Royal Institute of British Architects on dry rot, recommending Kyan’s process.
Five years after Mr. Kyan’s invention, viz. in 1837, a Mr. Flocton invented a process for preventing decay, by saturating timber with wood-tar and acetate of iron, but little is known of this invention: we believe it was a failure.
During the same year Mr. Flocton’s process was made known, a Frenchman named Letellier recommended saturating timber in a solution of corrosive sublimate, and when dry, into one of glue, size, &c.[9]
During this year Mr. Margary took out his patent for applying sulphate of copper to wood. We propose to describe Margary’s process further on: we do not think he received any medals for it.
We now arrive at the modern creosoting process, which was brought to perfection by the late Mr. John Bethell. Mr. Bethell’s process of creosoting, or the injection of the heavy oil of tar, was first patented by him on July 11th, 1838.[10] It consists in impregnating the wood throughout with oil of tar, and other bituminous matters containing creosote, and also with pyrolignite of iron, which holds more creosote in solution than any other watery menstruum. Creosote, now so extensively used in preserving wood, is obtained from coal tar, which, when submitted to distillation, is found to consist of pitch, essential oil (creosote), naphtha, ammonia, &c. In the application of the oil of tar for this purpose, it is now considered to be indispensable that the ammonia be got rid of; otherwise the wood sometimes becomes brown and decays, as may be constantly seen in wood coated with the common oil tar. The kind of creosote preferred by continental engineers and chemists, and also by the late Mr. John Bethell himself, is thick, and rich in naphthaline. Some English chemists now seem to prefer the thinnest oil, which contains no naphthaline, but a little more carbolic acid; the crude carbolic acid would vary from 5 to 15 per cent.: no engineer has ever required more than 5 per cent. of crude carbolic acid in creosote. The thinner oil appears to be more likely to be drawn out of the wood by the heat of the sun or absorption in powdery soil, and is more readily dissolved out by moisture.
Mummies many thousands of years old have evidently been preserved on the creosoting principle, and from observing the mummies the process of creosoting suggested itself to Mr. Bethell. The ancient Egyptians, whether from the peculiarity of their religious opinions, or from the desire to shun destruction and gain perpetuity even for their dead bodies, prepared the corpses of their deceased friends in a particular way, viz. by coagulating the albumen of the various fluids of the body by means of creosote, cedar oil, salt, and other substances, and also by excluding the air. How perfectly this method has preserved them the occasional opening of a mummy permits us to see. A good account of the operation is given in the chapter on mummies, in the second volume of Egyptian Antiquities in the ‘Library of Entertaining Knowledge.’
By the process of creosoting the timber is rendered more durable, and less liable to the attack of worms; but it becomes very inflammable; that is, when once alight burns quickly; in addition to which, the disagreeable odour from timber so treated renders it objectionable for being used in the building of dwelling-houses.