On the question for striking out as moved by Mr Govr Morris, from the word "qualifications" to the end of the III article

N. H. no. Mass. no. Ct no. Pa no. Del. ay. Md divd. Va no. N. C. no. S. C. no. Geo. not prest.

Adjourned


Wednesday Augst 8. In Convention

Art: IV. sect. 1.–Mr Mercer expressed his dislike of the whole plan, and his opinion that it never could succeed.

Mr Ghorum. he had never seen any inconveniency from allowing such as were not freeholders to vote, though it had long been tried. The elections in Phila, N. York & Boston where the Merchants & Mechanics vote are at least as good as those made by freeholders only. The case in England was not accurately stated yesterday (by Mr Madison). The Cities & large towns are not the seat of Crown influence & corruption. These prevail in the Boroughs, and not on account of the right which those who are not freeholders have to vote, but of the smallness of the number who vote. The people have been long accustomed to this right in various parts of America, and will never allow it to be abridged. We must consult their rooted prejudices if we expect their concurrence in our propositions.

Mr Mercer did not object so much to an election by the people at large including such as were not freeholders, as to their being left to make their choice without any guidance. He hinted that Candidates ought to be nominated by the State Legislatures.

On the question for agreeing to Art: IV–Sect, 1 it passd nem. con.

Art. IV. Sect. 2. taken up.