Mr. Cunningham. The bullets.
Mr. Rhyne. Yes; my question related just to the bullets.
Mr. Cunningham. I identified the cartridge cases.
Mr. Rhyne. He was positive about the cartridge cases, but not about the bullets.
Representative Boggs. Now, would it be likely to find these cartridge cases, which you can positively identify as having been fired from this weapon—would it be likely that these bullets which you cannot identify as having been fired from this weapon—would it be likely that they would be fired from another weapon under those circumstances?
Mr. Cunningham. Well, that, sir, depends on other extraneous facts other than my comparisons and examinations. In other words, I can only testify to what I actually found from an examination and comparison of those bullets with these test bullets from that gun. And as to anything else, I cannot testify. I mean—that would be based upon other facts.
Mr. Eisenberg. Carrying some of these questions a little bit further, Mr. Cunningham, you say that this bullet could have been fired from this gun, and was fired from a gun with these rifling characteristics?
Mr. Cunningham. Yes.
Mr. Eisenberg. Which you said were five lands, five grooves, right twist?
Mr. Cunningham. Yes.