141 Clinical Medicine.
142 Reynolds's Sys., vol. ii.
143 Unpublished MSS.
144 Amer. Journ. Med. Sci., Oct., 1882.
145 Brit. Med. Journal, Dec., 1877.
146 Med. and Surgical Reports Boston City Hospital, 2d Ser., 1877.
147 Altimont, loc. cit.
Such being the record, we are in duty bound to try simple aspirations before making use of the more radical modes of treatment. The character of the fluid as drawn off by the exploring-needle furnishes valuable indications. Should it be found laudable and inodorous, we had better aspirate once or twice before resorting to the free incision. It can do no injury, and we thus enable the lung to expand, diminish the size of the cavity, and prepare for the more radical operation. In children we ought to try this mode repeatedly unless we have symptoms of emaciation and hectic approaching; in adults only two or three times. The operation is simple, painless, without danger, and occasionally perfectly effective. If the fluid re-forms quickly—and it sometimes does with astonishing rapidity—or there are evidences of depression from fever, sweats, and diarrhoea, we must promptly have recourse to one of the effective surgical methods producing free drainage. It is undeniable that the treatment by thoracentesis is frequently unsuccessful, notwithstanding repeated operations.
In sero-fibrinous effusions the close method is the most successful, but in purulent effusion this is not ordinarily the case, and we are forced to employ the open method to produce free, continuous discharges, as the purulent fluid re-forms rapidly.
Open Methods.—Of these we have—(1) drainage through a single orifice by the introduction of a permanent canula or soft india-rubber tube; (2) drainage through two openings; (3) use of syphon; (4) pleurotomy; (5) drainage by resection of ribs. Each of these modes has its advocates. They have all been frequently used with varying results. Each has its advantages and disadvantages.