The first point to be noted about these modes of operation is, that we cannot prevent the introduction of a greater or less amount of air to replace the fluid, and therefore it is of primary importance that we should always render the air aseptic. The incision must be made after thoroughly cleansing the point to be opened. The bistoury, the canula, the dressings, the receptacles of the pus, the sponges, and everything connected with the operation, should be purified to prevent the possibility of the contamination of the pleural cavity and its contents. At each subsequent dressing all these precautions should be renewed. Antiseptic gauze of six or eight layers in thickness, with finely-combed oakum or salicylated cotton, ought to be placed over and around the orifice for an area of twelve inches. In this way what little air enters after the operation may be rendered thoroughly aseptic.
Lister148 recommends that the coverings of gauze should be in eight folds if the drainage be excessive—that these be charged with a disinfectant composed of one part of carbolic acid to four parts of resin and pure paraffin. The dressings, he directs, should be kept in place by elastic bandages. This treatment stops suppuration promptly, and converts the discharge into one of a serous nature. His views have been amply confirmed. A. T. Cabot149 recommends that the dressings be covered with a piece of mackintosh large enough to project in every direction. In his cases he found it acted as a valvular fold, forcing the air and pus out and preventing air from entering.
148 "Lectures on Clin. Surgery, etc.," London Lancet, Dec., 1879.
149 Loc. cit.
Drainage by Canula through a Single Orifice.—The patient, having had about three hours previously a good substantial meal of easily-digested food, is placed in a semi-recumbent position, leaning over toward the healthy side. Before selecting the point of puncture, the side ought to be first washed with soap and water, so as thoroughly to remove all dirt and epithelium débris, and then bathed in a 1:20 solution of carbolic acid. As there is to be but one opening through which the fluid is to pass, it is desirable to have it low down. The eighth intercostal space, somewhat behind the posterior axillary line, is ordinarily the best point for the puncture. Lower than that we may encounter the diaphragm, and, as we must use a trocar of considerable size, we may inflict serious injury. As we desire to completely empty the pleural cavity, a higher point would not be as effective. After having satisfied ourselves of the presence of fluid at the point selected by the physical exploration, we ought always to insert, as a crucial test, a new exploratory hypodermic needle which has been rendered aseptic. Ordinarily, it is not necessary or expedient to resort to etherization, unless in case of a child, for local anæsthesia by cocaine hypodermically, by rhigoline or the ether spray, or by the application of a small piece of ice covered with salt (as suggested by Powell), will render the incision painless. It is needless to add that a weakened heart, a sluggish capillary circulation causing a cyanotic appearance, and marked dyspnoea contraindicate the employment of etherization. We prefer cutting through the integument with a bistoury, and then inserting the trocar, which must be pushed with a thrust through to the pleura. All of the pus should be allowed to escape, unless cough, oppression, or threatening syncope should be noticed, in which case it is better to insert the tube and arrest the flow by a cork. The outward flow should be rendered slow by covering the orifice with the dressings and allowing the fluid to soak into them. The tube should only be long enough to go well through the parietes into the pleural sac; otherwise it acts as an irritant, and interferes with the adhesion of the two pleural surfaces, which is necessary for the obliteration of the pus-secreting cavity and the expansion of the lung. The tube should be kept in position by a hard-rubber shield attachment, with bandages previously soaked in disinfectants applied around the body, and several layers of carbolized gauze. The firm canulæ, metallic or hard rubber, straight or curved, as proposed by Woillez and Dieulafoy, are now generally abandoned. These admit air either by the sides of the opening or through their canals, and they sometimes produce, at their extremities, local ulceration through the lung or even through the diaphragm, and cause peritonitis. Their only advantage consists in the facilities they offer for washing out the cavity. With canulæ made of soft india-rubber there is no danger of injuring the lung, etc. They are not painful to the patient, and they can be protected by valvular strips of gold-beater's skin or some soft substance at their orifices. Through these india-rubber tubes we can inject all fluids and washes, except those containing iodine. It has been proved by Dujardin-Beaumetz150 that iodine hardens india-rubber, renders it extremely brittle, and destroys its elasticity in a short time, even after a contact of forty-eight hours. In a case of Bucquoy's151 the tube underwent such alterations that it could only be extracted by a long and painful operation. If these tubes are in use when iodized fluid is to be injected, they must be temporarily removed, and a metallic one, with arrangements for a double current, substituted during the process of washing. If the canulæ are to be kept in permanently, they must be of large size, so as to allow free flow outward of fluid.
150 Quoted by Dieulafoy, Pneum. Asp., English ed.
151 Ibid.
After the operation the patient should always remain in bed in an easy, comfortable position, with the orifice covered by the dressings. His diet should be of an easily-digested and nutritious character. His temperature, pulse, and the condition of his secretions should be carefully watched. Ordinarily, it is not well to reopen the discharge-tube for three days. The same antiseptic precautions should be used then as at the operation, and a fresh tube inserted. The pus secreted ought, if the case be one of recent origin, to be small in quantity and without odor. After a few days it is best to allow the fluid to flow out on the dressings as it forms, which is done by turning the patient well over on his side. An occasional cough assists the discharge. Should the odor become putrid or gangrenous, or hectic symptoms show that the secretion is profuse and has no free exit, it becomes necessary at once to use washings and injections of simple warm water or warm water feebly alcoholized—1:45 or 1:80—or feebly iodized solutions. The greatest care should be taken with these washings that very gentle force be employed. (See [Pleurotomy].) This mode of operating is most effective in recent cases, for it gives the best opportunity to the lung to expand. It is the easiest to perform, and, subsequently, the least troublesome. If it be found ineffective, an additional orifice can be made and a fenestrated tube inserted, or the orifice can be enlarged by a free incision. There have been many successful cases of this mode of operating, but, as the author has sometimes found, it is difficult to establish free drainage, which is most important for the success of the treatment. The result of his experience has been that, in chronic cases especially, the two-opening drainage or free incision without tubes (pleurotomy) has finally to be employed. Powell recommends, after removing intra-thoracic pressure by aspiration or syphon, in a day or two to completely evacuate the fluid under the antiseptic spray and insert a tube for a few days only; then to allow the wound to heal, and await results, trusting nature to secrete a fibro-serous fluid which can be easily absorbed.
Drainage by two openings, as first effectively employed by Chassaignac, is made by the introduction, through a large covered canula, of a tube of india-rubber, perforated with holes, drawn out at another orifice. The tube has its two extremities on the outside, and one posterior, in the eighth or ninth intercostal space, and the other in front, in the seventh intercostal space, after the withdrawal of the canula. The anterior orifice is first made, and a long curved probe with a bulb at the end is passed through backward and downward until it strikes the posterior lowest intercostal space. The operator cuts down on the probe, which points outward. To this end the fenestrated drainage-tube is securely fastened, and is then drawn out through the first orifice. Both ends are retained out of their orifices, by a shield firmly fixed on the tube, for at least an inch. The pus flows out little by little, but continuously, through one or other orifice, according to the position of the patient. This is the most effective method to prevent accumulation. Unfortunately, false membranes and flocculi sometimes stop up the orifices in its walls, the pus does not flow out as it is formed, and there are all the evils of air and fluid mixed and retained in the serous cavity. It is, however, generally admitted that by this system of drainage a number of cases have been cured; but it is not often employed as a primary operation, as we wish to avoid, if possible, the irritation which may result from the presence of so much tubing in the chest. Moreover, it is not the best operation if there is any hope of the lung expanding again. In old chronic cases we cannot hope for more than very limited expansion.
Gross152 speaks of drainage-tubes as harsh and dangerous. Flint, Sr.,153 prefers free incisions, with introduction of tents, to drainage-tubes. Dabney154 considers continuous drainage in some form vastly preferable in the majority of cases. Israel155 had 10 cases recover out of 11 treated by thorough and continuous drainage. Cheadle believes that a large collection will certainly require a free opening in the end, and the sooner the pus is let out the better.