You have judged me perfectly right. If you had asked my advice I could not have been so dishonest as not to have given it for the decision you have made. Castlereagh and Canning have been fighting. Thank God Canning is not severely hurt, and Castlereagh is not touched. Terrible, all this, for public impression. What we are to do is not finally settled. It must end in an attempt to form an united Government with our opponents. But it is a bitter pill to swallow for more than one.
When I can tell you anything positive, and can get a moment to tell it, I will.
Yours very truly,
Sp. Perceval.
MILITARY EXPENSES (1806-1809).
Source.—Diary of Lord Colchester, 1861. Vol. ii., p. 239.
| The military expenses of the last four years have been:— | |||
| 1806.— | Army | £16,605,000 | |
| Navy | 15,448,000 | ||
| Ordnance | 4,366,000 | ||
| £36,419,000 | |||
| 1807.— | Army | £16,661,000 | |
| Navy (Expedition to Copenhagen) | 19,673,000 | ||
| Ordnance | 4,464,000 | ||
| £40,798,000 | |||
| 1808.— | Army | £17,365,000 | |
| Navy (Expedition to Spain and Portugal) | 18,156,000 | ||
| Ordnance | 3,980,000 | ||
| £39,501,000 | |||
| 1809.— | Army | £17,459,000 | |
| Vote of Credit | 2,500,000 | ||
| 19,959,000 | |||
| Navy (Expeditions to | |||
| Spain and Portugal, and Walcheren) | 18,986,000 | ||
| Vote of Credit | 500,000 | ||
| Additional | 1,291,000 | ||
| 20,777,000 | |||
| Ordnance | 5,275,000 | ||
| Total | £46,011,000 | ||
TALAVERA: PROTEST BY LORDS (1809).
Source.—Protests of the Lords. Vol. ii., 1741-1825, p. 423.
January 26, 1810.—The thanks of the Lords were voted to Lord Viscount Wellington for his services on the 27th and 28th of July, 1809, at the victory of Talavera. The title of Viscount Wellington of Talavera was conferred on the 4th of September, 1809. The motion was made by Lord Liverpool and opposed by Lords Suffolk, Grosvenor, and Grey. The following protest was inserted:
1st. Because in the battle of Talavera, though eminently distinguished by those splendid proofs of discipline and valour which his Majesty’s troops have never failed to display, we cannot recognize those unequivocal characteristics of victory which can alone form an adequate title to the thanks of this House. On the contrary, that the British army appears to have been improvidently led into a situation, in which the repulse of the enemy, effected with a great loss, produced neither security from a subsequent attack, nor relief from the distress under which our brave troops were suffering, and was immediately followed by the necessity of a precipitate retreat, whereby our wounded were left to fall into the hands of the enemy.
2ndly, Because, by voting the thanks of this House on such an occasion, we diminish the value of the most honourable reward we have it in our power to confer, whilst we indirectly sanction the propriety of that elevation to the honours of the peerage, with which his Majesty, without inquiry, was advised to mark his approbation of the commander of his army in Spain, at a time when his ministers were informed of the unfortunate consequences which might be expected to follow, and in fact did follow, that dear-bought success.