[127] 268 U.S. 501 (1925).
[128] 117 U.S. 697 (1886).
[129] 13 How. 40, 48 (1852). See also Keller v. Potomac Electric Power Co., 261 U.S. 428 (1923); Federal Radio Commission v. General Electric Co., 231 U.S. 464 (1930).
[130] 5 Wall. 419 (1867).
[131] Postum Cereal Co. v. California Fig Nut Co., 272 U.S. 693 (1927); Federal Radio Commission v. General Electric Co., 281 U.S. 464 (1930); Pope v. United States, 323 U.S. 1 (1944).
[132] 112 U.S. 50 (1884).
[133] Keller v. Potomac Electric Co., 261 U.S. 428 (1923).
[134] Federal Radio Commission v. General Electric Co., 281 U.S. 464 (1930).
[135] 279 U.S. 438 (1929). All of these rulings with respect to the vesting of revisory powers in the courts of the District carried the qualification that revisory actions and interlocutory opinions, as nonjudicial functions, were not reviewable on appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States. Frasch v. Moore, 211 U.S. 1 (1908); E.C. Atkins & Co. v. Moore, 212 U.S. 285 (1909); Keller v. Potomac Electric Co., 261 U.S. 428 (1923); Federal Radio Commission v. General Electric Co., 281 U.S. 464 (1930).
[136] O'Donoghue v. United States, 289 U.S. 516 (1933).