Table II.—Diurnal Variation Potential Gradient.

Station. Karasjok. Sodankylä. Kew(19, 12). Greenwich. Florence. Perpignan. Lisbon. Tokyo. Batavia. Cape
Horn(20).
Period. 1903-4. 1882-83. 1862-
1864.
1898-
1904.
1893-96. 1883-85. 1886-88. 1884-86. 1897-98
1900-1.
1887-
1890.
1890-
1895.
1882-83.
Days. All. All. Quiet. All. All. Fine. All. All. Dry. Dry. Pos.
h
l
5.5 3.0
2.5
3.5
1.0
3.35
1.3 
3.0
1.8
8.4
1.5
3.0
0.5
1.7
2.0
2 7.8 3.5
2.0
Hour.
1 83 91 87 93 97 92 78 84 101 147 125 82
2 73 85 79 88 89 83 72 80 98 141 114 73
3 66 82 74 84 87 77 71 78 97 135 109 85
4 63 84 72 83 86 75 72 81 99 128 102 81
5 60 89 71 85 86 74 77 83 121 127 101 85
6 68 91 77 93 92 82 92 92 154 137 117 95
7 81 97 92 103 100 100 107 101 167 158 147 106
8 87 100 106 112 102 112 114 105 149 104 119 118
9 94 98 107 115 100 113 111 104 117 67 82 119
10 101 102 100 112 101 107 100 104 87 42 55 123
11 99 98 90 101 96 100 96 102 70 35 46 123
Noon. 103 102 92 94 97 95 99 108 61 30 43 115
1 106 105 90 89 96 92 99 111 54 30 42 112
2 108 107 91 87 94 90 97 114 49 30 43 94
3 108 108 92 88 95 89 99 109 53 33 46 89
4 109 108 98 93 97 89 105 108 61 41 53 88
5 110 108 108 99 102 94 113 108 76 67 73 84
6 119 110 121 108 108 113 126 111 95 91 108 110
7 129 102 134 115 111 121 131 116 107 120 145 107
8 136 111 139 118 115 129 129 114 114 137 155 123
9 139 111 138 119 117 132 120 109 119 146 155 112
10 133 104 128 115 117 127 109 102 120 148 147 99
11 121 108 113 108 111 114 97 92 119 151 143 85
12 102 93 99 99 104 100 86 85 112 147 130 98

Table III.—Diurnal Variation Potential Gradient.

Station. Karasjok. Sodankylä. Kew. Greenwich. Bureau
Central (21).
Eiffel
Tower (21).
Perpignan (21). Batavia.
(2 m.)
Period. 1903-4. 1882-83. 1898-1904. 1894 and ’96. 1894-99. 1896-98. 1885-95. 1887-90.
Winter. Summer. Winter. Summer. Winter. Equinox.Summer. Winter. Summer. Winter. Summer. Summer. Winter. Summer. Winter. Summer.
Hour.
1 76 104 90 99 91 93 96 87 110 79 102 90 72 88 145 149
2 66 96 79 84 86 88 90 84 101 71 92 83 67 83 139 142
3 57 89 78 90 82 85 85 76 98 70 88 79 66 81 137 135
4 55 83 74 99 81 84 84 77 96 69 84 76 67 83 131 127
5 50 79 74 111 82 87 90 78 94 75 94 78 72 92 132 123
6 61 83 80 114 86 97 101 82 101 83 106 87 84 107 138 136
7 78 89 86 117 95 109 113 94 107 98 118 97 104 114 166 153
8 82 93 95 122 104 118 120 97 111 111 120 103 122 108 118 92
9 90 93 91 109 111 119 119 98 102 113 106 110 126 100 74 64
10 104 93 106 101 114 110 110 102 98 111 94 109 114 93 43 40
11 102 92 98 97 107 95 97 103 86 108 84 107 98 90 35 36
Noon. 119 90 98 100 102 86 87 107 94 106 77 104 99 95 31 30
1 116 94 116 97 99 81 80 107 85 112 79 107 96 93 29 33
2 118 97 113 97 97 80 76 109 82 112 81 110 94 90 28 32
3 119 100 121 93 99 82 76 111 78 111 78 107 95 88 24 41
4 115 99 111 96 103 88 80 116 81 113 80 105 102 92 30 49
5 120 106 105 106 108 96 87 112 93 120 85 106 115 98 60 74
6 131 104 115 92 111 109 98 114 98 124 97 109 128 110 88 94
7 136 110 118 102 114 120 111 117 99 124 123 113 133 122 119 122
8 134 113 117 106 112 124 123 113 108 116 134 110 131 127 138 135
9 137 125 115 90 111 123 129 111 118 104 130 109 124 125 145 147
10 125 135 112 90 108 118 125 110 124 97 122 105 111 117 148 148
11 114 126 113 103 103 109 116 102 120 90 115 101 96 108 149 152
12 96 111 95 85 96 99 105 93 116 83 108 94 83 95 148 146

At the temperate stations the maximum occurs near midwinter; in the Arctic it seems deferred towards spring.

6. Diurnal Variation.—Table II. gives the mean diurnal variation for the whole year at a number of stations arranged in order of latitude, the mean from the 24 hourly values being taken as 100. The data are some from “all” days, some from “quiet,” “fine” or “dry” days. The height, h, and the distance from the wall, l, were the potential is measured are given in metres when known. In most cases two distinct maxima and minima occur in the 24 hours. The principal maximum is usually found in the evening between 8 and 10 P.M., the principal minimum in the morning from 3 to 5 A.M. At some stations the minimum in the afternoon is indistinctly shown, but at Tokyo and Batavia it is much more conspicuous than the morning minimum.

7. In Table III. the diurnal inequality is shown for “winter” and “summer” respectively. In all cases the mean value for the 24 hours is taken as 100. By “summer” is meant April to September at Sodankylä, Greenwich and Batavia; May to August at Kew, Bureau Central (Paris), Eiffel Tower and Perpignan; and May to July at Karasjok. “Winter” includes October to March at Sodankylä, Greenwich and Batavia; November to February at Kew and Bureau Central; November to January at Karasjok, and December and January at Perpignan. Mean results from March, April, September and October at Kew are assigned to “Equinox.”

At Batavia the difference between winter and summer is comparatively small. Elsewhere there is a tendency for the double period, usually so prominent in summer, to become less pronounced in winter, the afternoon minimum tending to disappear. Even in summer the double period is not prominent in the arctic climate of Karasjok or on the top of the Eiffel Tower. The diurnal variation in summer at the latter station is shown graphically in the top curve of fig. 1. It presents a remarkable resemblance to the adjacent curve, which gives the diurnal variation at mid-winter at the Bureau Central. The resemblance between these curves is much closer than that between the Bureau Central’s own winter and summer curves. All three Paris curves show three peaks, the first and third representing the ordinary forenoon and afternoon maxima. In summer at the Bureau Central the intermediate peak nearly disappears in the profound afternoon depression, but it is still recognizable. This three-peaked curve is not wholly peculiar to Paris, being seen, for instance, at Lisbon in summer. The December and June curves for Kew are good examples of the ordinary nature of the difference between midwinter and midsummer. The afternoon minimum at Kew gradually deepens as midsummer approaches. Simultaneously the forenoon maximum occurs earlier and the afternoon maximum later in the day. The two last curves in the diagram contrast the diurnal variation at Kew in potential gradient and in barometric pressure for the year as a whole. The somewhat remarkable resemblance between the diurnal variation for the two elements, first remarked on by J.D. Everett (19), is of interest in connexion with recent theoretical conclusions by J.P. Elster and H.F.K. Geitel and by H. Ebert.