Later Speaker dropped down on Page Croft.
"The hon. member," he said, "is not entitled to interrupt because some argument suddenly strikes him."
House laughed at this piquant way of putting it. Sark recalls curious fact. 321 years ago the same dictum was framed in almost identical phrase. Essential difference was that it was the Speaker of the day who was rebuked. He was Edward Coke, whose connection with one Lyttelton is not unfamiliar in Courts of Law. Appearing at bar of House of Lords at opening of eighth Parliament of Elizabeth, which met 19th February, 1593, Speaker submitted the petition, forthcoming to this day on opening of a new Parliament, asking for privilege of speech.
"Privilege of speech is granted," said the Lord Keeper on behalf of the Queen. "But you must know what privilege you have. Not to speak everyone what he listeth, or what cometh into his brain to titter."
Eight o'clock struck before turmoil ceased and House got into Committee on Navy Estimates. In a twinkling over £15,000,000 sterling voted. That nothing to what straightway followed. Getting into Committee on Ways and Means, House voted some £68,000,000 on account of the services of the year.
After this, House was counted out. In imitation of proverbial character of current month, having come in as a lion it went out like a lamb.
Business done.—Tumultuous debate on Ulster side-issue. Huge sums voted in Committee of Supply.
Tuesday.—Renewal of yesterday's excitement round action of certain officers of the Army in Ireland. Seely promised to circulate in the morning all papers relating thereto. To members of county councils, parish councils, and the like obscure consultative bodies, it would seem reasonable to wait opportunity for studying papers before debating their contents. We have a better way at Westminster. Business set down was the Army Vote. Seely explained that for financial reasons it was absolutely necessary money should be voted. Necessity admitted, this was done. But not till four hours had been occupied in inflaming talk. As for the vote for many millions, no time was left to talk about it. Accordingly agreed to without comment or criticism.
Amery struck note of Opposition criticism on Curragh affair by describing "how meanly the Secretary of State for War sneaked out of the position into which he so proudly strutted a few days ago." More of same genial kind of talk from benches near. But as debate went forward Members evidently became possessed of growing sense of gravity of situation.
It was the Labour Members who effected the change. For first time in life of present Parliament they with united front took the lead at a grave national crisis, representing without bluster the vastness of the social and political force behind them. John Ward in weighty speech brought down the real question from nights of personal animosity and party rancour. It was "whether the discipline of the Army is to be maintained; whether it is to continue to be a neutral force to assist the civil power; or whether in future the House of Commons, representing the people, is to submit its decisions for approval to a military junta.".