+ + + Sat. R. 101: 141. F. 3, ’06. 1710w.
Marks, Alfred. Who killed Sir Edmund Berry Godfrey? with an introd. by Father J. H. Pollen. *$1.10. Benziger.
Once more the question of how Sir Edmund Godfrey met death is started and answered. In the author’s opinion “Godfrey was not and could not have been killed in Somerset house, and all the arguments which can be collected to show that he had an erratic and melancholy disposition are marshaled in favor of his suicide. Not only does Mr. Marks strike at Mr. Pollock’s version of the case so far as the testimony of Bedloe and Prance is concerned, but he scouts the notion that Godfrey was in possession of a fatal secret.” (Nation.)
Reviewed by Andrew Lang.
Acad. 69: 1120. O. 28, ’05. 1030w.
“Mr. Marks discusses with the acuteness of a criminal lawyer, all the evidence. It says much for the lucidity of his treatment of the mass of contradictions, obscurities, confessions, retractions, and conflicting testimonies, that his reader may follow him without any great strain of attention.”
+ Cath. World. 82: 834. Mr. ’06. 230w.
“Though Mr. Marks does not arrange his matter to the best advantage, and digresses too much from the professed subject of his book, it is, in spite of these defects, a most valuable contribution to the elucidation of the Popish plot.” C. H. Firth.
+ – Eng. Hist. R. 21: 169. Ja. ’06. 730w.