“Mr. Marks writes forcibly, and makes the most of his arguments, but the contemporary evidence is so hopelessly tangled and open to suspicion that we fear the mystery must remain insoluble.”
+ Nation. 82: 12. Ja. 4, ’06. 620w.
Marshall, John. Constitutional decisions; ed. by Joseph P. Cotton, jr. 2 v. ea. *$5. Putnam.
“We have here in convenient form the opinions of Marshall, which in themselves constitute so large a part of the constitutional history of the United States. There is a general introduction, and each decision is introduced by an ample note setting forth the historical circumstances in which the case arose, and indicating with precision, without undue technicality of expression, the significance of the principles in the development of American law.” (Am. Hist. R.)
“The editor of these volumes has performed a useful task in a satisfactory manner. It is not impossible to find fault with some of the statements of the editor or with his point of view.” A. C. McLaughlin.
+ + – Am. Hist. R. 11: 695. Ap. ’06. 880w.
“Fuller (though not, we think, better) than John M. Dillon’s collection published three years ago.”
+ Nation. 83: 148. Ag. 16, ’06. 1080w. + N. Y. Times. 10: 915. D. 23, ’05. 1150w. Outlook. 83: 479. Je. 23, ’06. 960w.
Marshall, Thomas. Aristotle’s theory of conduct. Macmillan.