+ + Outlook. 82: 570. Mr. 10, ’06. 320w. (Review of v. 12.)
“Accuracy and impartiality are also distinctive characteristics, but from the standpoint of proportion there is no room for improvement. Altogether, his is a most creditable addition to this standard work.”
+ + + Outlook. 82: 1006. Ap. 28, ’06. 340w. (Review of v. 13.)
“In some respects Professor Turner’s book differs strikingly from most of its predecessors in the series. Most significant, perhaps, is the emphasis laid upon the necessity of regarding the development of the United States as the outcome of economic and social as well as political forces.”
+ + Outlook. 83: 333. Je. 9, ’06. 300w. (Review of v. 14.)
“Much as we must lament the absence of that appeal to the imagination which the historian should make, the merits of the treatise are such that it may be safely commended.”
+ + – Outlook. 83: 766. Jl. 28, ’06. 320w. (Review of v. 15.) + + Outlook. 83: 1004. Ag. 25, ’06. 350w. (Review of v. 16.)
“Is marked by daring and originality and, it is pleasant to be able to add, by scholarship. It is not, however, cast in the most attractive form, being monographic rather than unitary in treatment, and being of the scientific rather than the artistic school of historical writing.”
+ + – Outlook. 84: 938. D. 15, ’06. 300w. (Review of v. 17.)
Review by W. Roy Smith.