GODT: III-d refers to the necessity of adopting defense measures.
FLOTTENRICHTER KRANZBÜHLER: Is that reference connected with the fourth question I put to you now: “Will the harbors have to be developed to the fullest extent as bases, or do they already offer decisive advantages as possible supply points?”
GODT: These two questions are not connected.
FLOTTENRICHTER KRANZBÜHLER: Was that fourth question put to you?
GODT: Yes.
FLOTTENRICHTER KRANZBÜHLER: Was it answered?
GODT: Not in this letter.
FLOTTENRICHTER KRANZBÜHLER: What is the significance of the figures II and III? Do they not answer the question of whether these ports must be developed as bases or whether they can be used just as supply points?
GODT: They indicate what was thought necessary in order to develop them to the fullest extent as bases.
FLOTTENRICHTER KRANZBÜHLER: Will you please read the last sentence of the document? There it says, “Establishment of a fuel supply point in Narvik as an alternative supply point.” Is that not a reply to the question asking whether a supply point is enough?