New plan of organization by Brack. (Karl Brandt 8, Karl Brandt Ex. 3; Karl Brandt 15, Karl Brandt Ex. 3.) Testimony of Karl Brandt. (Tr. p. 2403.)
Affidavit of Brack. (Tr. p. 7550.)
Judgment of the International Military Tribunal[[101]] according to which Frick, as Reich Minister of the Interior, is made responsible for the carrying out of the euthanasia project.
Direct correspondence of the Bouhler office with the competent authorities prove that Karl Brandt was not involved: Letter from Brack to Schlegelberger. (NO-842, Pros. Ex. 405.) Letter from Brack to Freisler. (NO-843, Pros. Ex. 406.) Letter from Himmler to Brack. (NO-018, Pros. Ex. 404.)
Complaints of the national and ecclesiastical authorities and of civilians did not reach Karl Brandt.
Complaint by Schlaich, Chief of the Mental Institution of Stetten. This director who worked in this specialized field does not know anything of Karl Brandt. (NO-520, Pros. Ex. 374.)
Affidavit of Sprauer of 23 April 1946. The witness does not mention Karl Brandt in this affidavit. (3896-PS, Pros. Ex. 372.) (Only in a later affidavit of 19 November 1946, does he add a pertinent, general statement.)
Actual complaints are transferred by the ministries to the Bouhler office, not to Karl Brandt. (616-PS, Pros, Ex. 403.)
Specific examples.
Statement of Pfannmueller, according to which the invitation for the experts’ conference was made by Bouhler. (Tr. p. 7316.)