[57:1] Contemporary Review, February 1875, p. 337 ff. [ibid. p. 59 ff.]
[58:1] Contemporary Review, February 1875, p. 339 [ibid. p. 62].
[59:1] Contemporary Review, February 1875, p. 340 [ibid. p. 63].
[59:2] S.R. i. p. 263 f. I have introduced numbers for facility of reference.
[60:1] Dr. Lightfoot says in this volume: "The reading 'most' is explained in the preface to that edition as a misprint" (p. 63, n. 2). Not so at all. "A slip of the pen" is a very different thing.
[60:2] Contemporary Review, February 1875, p. 341 [ibid. p. 64].
[61:1] Ueber d. Urspr. u.s.w. des Christennamens, p. 7, Anm. 1.
[61:2] Zeitschr. wiss. Theol. 1874, p. 211, Anm. 1. I should have added that the priority which Lipsius still maintains is that of the text, as Dr. Lightfoot points out in his Apostolic Fathers (part ii. vol. i. 1885, p. 273, n. 1), and not of absolute origin; but this appears clearly enough in the quotations I have made.
[61:3] Contemporary Review, February 1875, p. 841 [ibid. p. 65].
[62:1] S.R. i. p. 259 f.