[62:2] Contemporary Review, February 1875, p. 342 [ibid. p, 65 f.]
[62:3] S.R. i. p. 259.
[63:1] Contemporary Review, February 1875, p. 342. In a note Dr. Lightfoot states that my references to Lipsius are to his earlier works, where he still maintains the priority and genuineness of the Curetonian Epistles. Certainly they are so: but in the right place, two pages further on, I refer to the writings in which he rejects the authenticity, whilst still maintaining his previous view of the priority of these letters [ibid. p. 66].
[64:1] Calvin's expressions are: "Nihil naeniis illis, quae sub Ignatii nomine editae sunt, putidius. Quo minus tolerabilis est eorum impudentia, qui talibus larvis ad fallendum se instruunt" (Inst. Chr. Rel. i. 13, § 39).
[64:2] Contemporary Review, February 1875, p. 342.
[64:3] Op. Theolog. 1652, 11, p. 1085.
[64:4] Contemporary Review, February 1875, p. 342 [ibid. p. 66]. Dr. Lightfoot refers to Pearson's Vindiciae Ignat. p. 28 (ed. Churton).
[65:1] Exam. Concilii Tridentim, 1614, i. p. 85 (misprinted 89).
[65:2] Contemporary Review, February 1875, p. 343 [ibid. p. 67].
[67:1] Critici Sacri, lib. ii cap. 1; Op. Theolog. 1652, ii. p. 1086.