The disorder and squalor of the home communicate themselves to the inmates; the lack of room obliges the children to live, during a great part of the day, on the streets, with the result that they are brought into contact with all sorts of demoralizing companions. Finally, the living together of a great number of uneducated persons in one small dwelling is the cause of constant quarrels and fights. The situation of those who are merely night-lodgers is especially unfortunate, as we have already seen.

In Part I we have quoted from authors who have laid stress upon the importance of the question of housing conditions in the study of criminality (Hirsch, for example), and we have indicated the gravity of this cause in speaking of prostitution and alcoholism.

It would be possible to quote a number of authors who have taken up the effect of housing conditions upon morals.[88] However, it is naturally very difficult to express this influence in figures. As far [[421]]as I know it is Dr. E. Laspeyres who (in “Der Einfluss der Wohnung auf die Sittlichkeit”) gives the most significant data upon this subject. I borrow from him the following figures: summarizing part of the results of a study of “Furnished Rooms” in 2,360 dwellings:[89]

Paris, 1849.

Table I.

Arrondissements.Good Dwellings.
%
Conduct of the Inmates.
Men.Women.
Good.
%
Very Bad.
%
Good.
%
Very Bad.
%
The 6 arrondissements with the smallest number of good dwellings 35 46 10 20.4 19
The 6 arrondissements with the largest number of good dwellings 44.5 50 2.5 21.7 14
The 12 arrondissements together 39 48 6.4 21.0 16.6
The figures cited above in proportion to all Paris = 100 89 96 156 97 114
114 104 39 103 86
100 100 100 100 100

Table II.[90]

Arrondissements.Very Bad Dwellings.
%
Conduct of the Inmates.
Men.Women.
Very Bad.
%
Good.
%
Very Bad.
%
Good.
%
The 6 arrondissements with the greatest number of very bad dwellings 13.6 9 45 20.2 21.3
The 6 arrondissements with the smallest number of very bad dwellings 6.0 2.2 52 11.7 21.0
The 12 arrondissements together 11 6.4 48 16.6 21.0
The figures cited above in proportion to all Paris = 100 124 141 94 122 101
55 34 108 70 100
100 100 100 100 100

[[422]]

Table III.[91]