Arrondissements.Good and Rather Good Dwellings.
%
Conduct of the Inmates.
Men.Women.
Good and Rather Good.
%
Bad and Very Bad.
%
Good and Rather Good.
%
Bad and Very Bad.
%
The 6 arrondissements with the smallest number of good and rather good dwellings 75 70 30 50 50
The 6 arrondissements with the greatest number of good and rather good dwellings 86 81 19 58 42
The 12 arrondissements together 80 74.5 25.5 53 47
The figures cited above in proportion to all Paris = 100 94 94 118 96 106
107 109 71 109 91
100 100 100 100 100

Although the division according to good and bad conduct is somewhat arbitrary, and although it is impossible to separate the effect of bad housing from other influences operative at the same time, yet these figures say plainly: there is a relationship between housing and conduct. It is evident that there is a reciprocal effect between the condition of the dwelling and the conduct of the inmates, but this fact does not diminish the influence of the dwelling.[92]

Finally, we add some figures upon the influence of furnished rooms as residence, summarizing the results of an inquiry into industries in Paris, made in 1860 and including 400,000 persons:[93]

Paris, 1860.

I. Men.

Occupations. In Furnished Rooms. Conduct Doubtful or Bad.
% %
90 occupations 5 3
90 occupations,, 14 9
90 occupations,, 28 12
270 occupations 20 9

[[423]]

Proportion to all the occupations = 100.

90 occupations 25 13
90 occupations,, 70 100
90 occupations,, 140 133
270 occupations 100 100

II. Women.