i. The penalty. The present codes give prominence to three kinds of penalties: fines, different kinds of imprisonment, and capital punishment. We naturally do not have to say anything of the first of these, since there can be no question raised as to its effect upon the person upon whom the fine is laid. All that we can say is that this penalty fails of its object since no account is taken of the financial condition of the person sentenced to it, and it follows that while the punishment involved is only trifling for the rich, it constitutes a heavy burden for the poor. Often a fine for a poor man who cannot pay is simply a sentence to a short imprisonment.

The death penalty also naturally is outside of our present discussion. I would simply observe that among the numerous arguments against this penalty it must be noted that it has no intimidating effect upon those who are present, as one would suppose, but on the contrary a demoralizing influence; besides which the attention of the ignorant class is drawn to the crime and the perpetrator of it. Those who are condemned to death have almost all been present at executions. Out of a total of 511 of whom we have information, there were only 15 (about 3%) who had never witnessed an execution.[304]

In investigating the influence of punishment upon morality it is imprisonment alone, therefore, which must be taken into consideration, so much the more since even in the case of minor crimes it is almost always inflicted, while capital punishment is either altogether abolished, as in some countries, or else rarely pronounced and still more rarely executed.

The following table shows how many times imprisonment is inflicted in comparison with other forms of punishment. [[520]]

Germany, 1882–1895.[305]

Years.Penalties to Each 1,000 Persons Sentenced.
Death.Imprisonment (All kinds.)Fines.Public Admonition.
1882 0.3 736.3 253 10
1883–87 annual average 0.2 697.4 291 11
1888–92 0.1 660.2 323 17
1893 0.1 619.2 363 18
1894 0.1 607.2 375 18
1895 0.1 595.2 386 19

60% to 70% of the sentences, then, were deprivation of liberty. What is the effect of this? The answer to this question must be found in the statistics of recidivism. Here are the results for certain countries of Europe, which probably are not much different from those of other countries.

Germany, 1882–1900.[306]

Years.Numbers of Recidivists to 100 Convicts.To 100,000 of the Population over 12 there were Recidivists who were Convicted
Once.Twice.3 to 5 Times.6 Times and Over.
1882 24.9 115 56 64 23
1883 25.8 119 59 69 20
1884 26.3 127 63 72 22
1885 27.4 127 63 75 26
1886 28.0 129 65 79 30
1887 28.8 131 66 81 34
1888 29.3 127 65 80 35
1889 31.2 142 71 87 40
1890 32.7 150 76 93 43
1891 34.0 158 79 99 47
1892 34.7 169 87 107 54
1893 35.2 171 88 111 57
1894 36.9 181 93 120 65
1895 37.9 184 96 124 69
1896 38.8 183 96 129 75
1897 39.6 186 99 129 78
1898 40.1 189 100 133 83
1899 40.8 187 100 133 85
1900 41.2 180 96 131 86