Examples of Rivet Stresses.
| — | Span in Feet. | Where Found. | Shear Stress in Tons per Square Inch. | Single or Double Shear. | Bearing Pressure in Tons per Square Inch. | Tight or Loose. | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Main girders | - | 85 | Web | 4·0 | D | 11·0 | Tight. | |||||||
| 66 | Diagonals | 9·0 | S | 9·0 | Many loose. | |||||||||
| 63 | „ | 14·9 | S | 16·3 | Tight generally. | |||||||||
| Small girders | - | 11 | Web | 1·4 | D | 7·0 | Tight. | |||||||
| 26 | „ | 4·3 | D | 24·0 | Many loose. | |||||||||
| 11 | „ | 7·3 | D | 20·6 | Loose. | |||||||||
| 11 | „ | 9·7 | D | 27·4 | Loose. | |||||||||
| End connections | - | 27 | Ends | 5·4 | S | 7·8 | Loose. | |||||||
| 12 | „ | 1·8 | D | - | 5·8 | - | Many loose. | |||||||
| 8·7 | ||||||||||||||
| (Type case) | 26 | „ | 4·8 | S | 7·0 | Tight. | ||||||||
It is probable that the fact of a rivet being in single or in double shear largely affects its ability to resist the effects of bearing pressure, as commonly estimated. In the first case, the rivet-shank must bear heavily on the half-thickness of the plates or bars through which it passes, rather than on the whole thickness; and it is to be supposed that under this condition it will work loose at a lower average stress than if it were in double shear, and the pressure better distributed.
Fig. 41. Fig. 42.
Fig. 41. and Fig. 42.
The author has no very definite information in support of this contention, but suggests that for double shear the permissible bearing pressure may probably be as much as 50 per cent. greater than for rivets in single shear; the difference being made rather in the direction of increasing the allowable load on double-shear rivets, than in reducing that upon rivets in single shear. The propriety of this is evident when it is considered that the practice has commonly been to make no distinction, so that whatever bearing pressures are found to be sufficient for both cases may be increased for those capable of taking the greater amount. [Figs. 41] and [42], here given, illustrate the behaviour of rivets under the two conditions.
With reference to the amounts of the stresses to which rivets may be subject, the author concludes, as a result of his experience, coupled with a consideration of known laboratory tests, that for all dead load these may be quite prudently higher than is frequently taken. For iron the shear stress to be 10 per cent. less than the stress of parts joined; and the bearing pressure—for single-shear rivets, 20 per cent.; and for double-shear rivets, 80 per cent. greater. For ordinary mild steel the shear stress to be 20 per cent. less than the stress in parts connected, and the bearing pressure equal to it for single-shear rivets; and 50 per cent. more for rivets in double shear, though the two latter values may probably approach those for wrought iron in steel of the higher grades sometimes used in bridge-work. For live load, or part live and part dead load, the same rules may apply, the reduction of the nominal working stress, arrived at by any one of the methods in use which may be adopted, affecting both the parts connected, and the rivets connecting them. For reverse stresses it is advisable to keep the shear stress in any rivet so low, say 3 tons per square inch, that the frictional resistance of the parts gripped by the rivets shall be sufficient to prevent any tendency to slip under the influence of the smaller of the two forces to which the part is liable, to insure that, if brought to a bearing in one direction by the greater force, it shall not go back with reversal of stress. This requirement may be open to some question with respect to good machine-riveted work, but for hand-riveted connections it may certainly be adopted with wisdom.