[731] Other cases similarly decided are as follows: 9 I.C.C. Rep., 382; 15 Idem, 376 and 555.
[732] 195 Fed. Rep., 541, L. & N. R. R. v. I. C. C. In this case there was no dispute as to facts, but only as to the conclusion to be drawn therefrom. A straight difference on points of fact was raised in the Pacific Coast Switching cases (188 Fed. Rep., 229). The dissenting opinion as to usurpation of the rights of the Commission is significant.
[733] 190 Fed. Rep., 591. Second opinion in 22 I. C. C. Rep., 149.
[734] Precisely like the situation following the earlier emasculation of the law. P. [473], supra.
[735] 215 U. S., 452. P. [538], supra.
[736] 61st Cong., 3rd sess., Senate doc., p. 725, 1911, 10 vols. Admirably summarized in American Economic Review, I, 1911, pp. 766-789. Yale Review, 1910, pp. 268-288. Haines Problems in Railway Regulation, 1911, pp. 143-154; and files of the Railway Age Gazette, especially 1910, p. 1108. H. A. Bullock in Boston Transcript, Nov. 12, 19, and 21, 1910, offers suggestive comment.
[737] Pp. [411] and [488], supra.
[740] 20 I. C. C. Rep., 243 and 307.