[83] Cf. p. [621], infra. Also the dialogue in 21 I.C.C. Rep., 356-359; and Ibid., 414.

[84] 5 I.C.C. Rep., 299; or 22 Idem, 407. Reprinted in Railway Problems.

[85] 14 I.C.C. Rep., 476.

[86] P. [178], infra.

[87] 5 I.C.C. Rep., 264; reprinted in our Railway Problems.

[88] Discussed on p. [232], infra.

[89] Chapter IX.

[90] Details in chap. VI.

[91] Cf. Carload Minimum in chap. IX and the Texas system on p. [393], infra.

The following cases best illustrate these principles: Burnham, Hanna, Munger, etc., 14 I.C.C., 299; and 20 Idem, 141; later in 218 U. S. Rep., 88. (P. [442], infra.) Greater Des Moines Committee, 14 Idem, [294]. Indianapolis, Kansas City and Fort Dodge, 16 Idem, 57, 195, and [572]. Warnock, 21 Idem, 546 and 23 Idem, 195. St. Louis Business Men's League, 9 Idem, 318. And the Wichita cases in chap. VII, p. [232], infra.