[683] These are:
| Oppert | No. | 35, | ‘mu’ | = | Weisbach | No. | 5. |
| ” | No. | 66, | ‘iz’ | = | ” | No. | 33. |
| ” | No. | 107, | ‘race’ | = | ” | No. | 82. |
| ” | No. | 49, | ‘la’ | Not in Weisbach. | |||
| ” | No. | 109, | ‘paz’ (animal) | Not in Weisbach. | |||
[684] Namely, No. 21, which Weisbach values as ‘zis’ No. 25. No. 20 Oppert includes among his signs, but cannot find its value. In Norris it is ‘kwe.’ In the list given in Sayce’s article it is ‘khub.’ Weisbach gives ‘kup (?)’ No. 29.
[685] Weisbach fails to find a value for 71ᵃ, to which Oppert gives ‘nu’ (No. 41).
[686] No. 35 Oppert ‘git,’ Weisbach ‘am’; 39ᶠ Oppert ‘mun,’ Weisbach ‘tum’; 71ᵇ Oppert ‘kin’; Weisbach ‘en’; 76 Oppert o, Weisbach u.
[687] Weisbach, op. cit. p. 33.
[688] Oppert, op. cit. p. 30.
[689] Oppert, pp. 77, 81-4. Weisbach, pp. 51, 53.
[690] Oppert, p. 62. Weisbach, p. 50.
[691] Oppert, p. 196. Weisbach, p. 77.