‘Quae nunc sub Phoebo ducibusque Palatia fulgent,
Quid nisi araturis pascua bubus erant?’
‘Qui’ is evidently a mistake for ‘Que.’
489 f. Fasti, i. 203 f.
499-504. From De Vita Monachorum, p. 181.
509 f. Cp. Mirour, 26605 ff. and Conf. Amantis, Prol. 910 ff.
519. This seems to be dependent on ‘noscat’ in the line above. The indicative in dependent question is quite usual, though not invariably found: cp. l. 516, where subjunctive and indicative are combined.
574. consequeretur eum, ‘should follow him,’ i.e. should be subject to man.
599. Arboribusque sitis. There must be something wrong here, but the variant given by D does not help us.
619. Nonne, used for ‘Num’: cp. v. 731.