[232.3] Gray, Shamash Religious Texts, p. 21.

[232.4] Dhorme, Choix, etc., p. 41, l. 136.

[232.5] Vide Cults, iii. p. 390, R. 57h.

[232.6] Ib., ii. p. 646.

[234.1] Robertson Smith, op. cit., pp. 272-273.

[234.2] Athenae. 376a (Cults, i. p. 141).

[234.3] Cults, ii. pp. 646-647.

[234.4] O. Weber, Dämonenbeschwörung, p. 29; his note on the passage “that the unclean beast is offered as a substitute for an unclean man” is not supported by any evidence.

[234.5] Zimmern, K.A.T.3, pp. 409-410.

[235.1] Robertson Smith’s theory that the gift-sacrifice was a later degeneracy from the communion-type is unconvincing; vide specially an article by Ada Thomsen, “Der Trug von Prometheus,” Arch. Relig. Wissensch., 1909, p. 460.