"Or for love's sake, a word that loves all men."
As a word cannot love, Hanmer, for 'loves,' read moves, Heath joys, Mason leads. I read 'Love's' for 'love's' and god for 'word.'
Act V.
Sc. 1.
"Witty without affection."
The 2nd folio reads, and, I think, most properly, 'affectation.' It is much more likely that a syllable should have been omitted by the printer, than that Nathaniel, who in general speaks correctly, should blunder. We have the very same error in v. 2, where the rime leaves no doubt on the subject.
"Laus Deo, bone intelligo—Bone! bone for bene;
Priscian a little scratch'd. 'Twill serve." [Aside.