[264] Debates, II, p. 1646, cited in University of Illinois Studies, March, 1904, p. 21.
[265] Senate (Elkins) Committee, 1905, I, pp. 32-34. Cf. also 10 I. C. C. Rep., 650. Another good instance on Arizona is in 16 Idem, 77.
[266] Page 2031.
[267] Senate (Elkins) Committee, 1905, II, p. 921.
[268] Cullom Committee, II, p. 101.
[269] 10 I.C.C. Rep., 81.
[270] Senate (Elkins) Committee, 1905, II, p. 919.
[271] Ibid., p. 1624.
[272] 11 I.C.C. Rep., 508.
[273] Question of Canadian Pacific Freight Differentials, Hearings, etc., Oct. 12, 1898, p. 17. Privately printed. See also pp. 72 and 116 on the same point.